نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی مدرسه عالی علوم انسانی، حکمت و تاریخ جامعه المصطفی العالمیة نمایندگی خراسان، مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی مشهد، مشهد، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
3 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract
One of the most significant legal and
judicial collaborations between countries is the extradition of criminals; a set of actions through which governments return fugitives who have fled to another country to each other. Governments sign extradition treaties with each other to maintain the security of their countries and to ensure criminals are brought to justice. This study examines the extradition of Shia criminals from an Islamic country governed by the principle of 'Velayat-e Faqih' to Islamic countries not governed by this principle. The findings indicate that, from a legal perspective, the extradition of criminals is accepted. However, from a jurisprudential standpoint, extraditing criminals poses challenges, raising the question of whether an Islamic government with a jurist at its helm can enter into such agreements with non-Shia Islamic countries. If permissible, compliance with it is necessary for the Islamic government, and if not permissible, entering into extradition agreements is considered a contract based on forbidden actions and is invalid. This research is of a descriptive-analytical nature, gathering library information, where the author delves into the extradition of criminals in Imami jurisprudence sources and Iranian laws.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)