نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی دانشگاه مازندران (نویسنده مسئول)
2 دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران
3 دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه تهران مرکز
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Interrogation investigations are foreseen in most legal systems. However, in the Iranian judiciary, the allocation of specific religious evidence to prove crimes punishable by had (fixed punishments) and retaliation, as well as the principle of the need to provide religious evidences in front of the ruler has formed a kind of confrontation of jurisprudential rules with legal regulations and imposed it on the preliminary investigation body of the court. Due to the issues related to the ruling of the judge, the process of the preliminary investigation of the investigator in the face of the religious evidences of Hadds and retaliation has been severely overshadowed by this issue. The practical attitudes of the courts in dealing with this issue have always been different, and as a result, there is a constant fear of violating the rights of plaintiffs and defendants, and it is necessary to have a unified solution in this regard. The present article tries to provide practical solutions to solve this issue.
کلیدواژهها [English]