نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 طلبه سطح خارج فقه و اصول مکتب نرجس و دانش‌پژوه دکتری جامعة المصطفی العالمیه
3 دانش‌آموخته سطح 3 مکتب نرجس و دانش‌پژوه دکتری جامعة المصطفی العالمیه
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Transaction with the intention of escaping from debt is one of the issues that the status of its correctness and inaccuracy can be seen in its jurisprudential background. This research, with the method of analysis and study of sources, has examined the question of what is the verdict of a serious deal with the intention of fleeing from debt? In Iranian civil law, which is influenced by Shiite jurisprudence, the transaction itself cannot be said to be invalid or suspended since it has the conditions of validity, but rather this transaction is valid and according to the general rules of contracts, the transaction is authenticated, unless those excluded with reason. Iraqi civil law does not enforce this transaction and states that the reason is the trickery and deception of the debtor and the damage to the creditor, and the most important basis in this regard is the public guarantee for the creditors, the trick of the debtor and the loss of the creditor. On the other hand, paying attention to the possession of the unbanned debtor and the necessity of fulfilling the promise in the transaction, as well as fulfilling the financial obligations and consequently defending the rights of the creditors in case of damage to them, it is necessary for the legislator to think of a solution. Therefore, alongside the validity of the transaction, he has given the creditor the right to request the seizure of the debtor's property in the amount of debt from the court, so this view of Iranian civil law is closer and more coordinated with the jurisprudential principles.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
کتاب‌ها و مقالات
ب) قوانین
القانون المدنی العراقی رقم 40 سنة 1951م.
)