نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشگاه ایلام
2 دانشجوی دکترای دانشگاه ایلام
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The infant girl's Ifda’ (inflicting a special injury to her vagina) has different rules and consequences and can be explored from many angles. Given the importance of the subject and the disagreements of the jurisprudents over some of its rulings, the necessity of re-examining the proofs of its consequences is further advanced. This descriptive-analytical study, using documentary and library sources, explores the dimensions of this issue, and seeks to provide a rationale for revising this jurisprudential issue. In the event of a dispute over the jurisprudential proving arguments of Ifda’ and proof of the removal of that state, the religious necessity of implementing some of its religious consequences may also be debated, especially as medical and surgical science has advanced in this age, this question arises that if the injury is eliminated by surgery or by other means, will the Jurisprudential consequences of Ifda’ be abolished? The cited arguments of eternal prohibition and the obligation of alimony for the defected girl, even in the case of a divorce and marriage to another man, are not based on a solid foundation. The result obtained about the effect of treatment in the removal of Ifda’s jurisprudential consequences is positive; Because the cause of creation of the consequences was the existence of a defect, and when that defect is removed by treatment and surgery, this means the deterioration of the cause of the consequences, and as a result, the effect, which is eternal prohibition, disappears.
کلیدواژهها [English]
قرآن کریم