نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. ایران
2 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی؛ دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی. مشهد. ایران
3 استاد گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی؛ دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی. مشهد. ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The inference of jurisprudential rulings is directly related to the manner in which their arguments are implied. Among the various meanings, obligatory signification is of great importance, which should not be neglected. There are various obligatory implications for discovering the rules of Sharia, some of which have received less attention. The present article seeks to answer the question with a descriptive and analytical method, what specific position can be assigned to the issues related to this meaning in the discussion of the arguments and Hajj of Sharia? For this purpose, first, the cases of obligatory implications effective in inferring the jurisprudential ruling, such as obligatory implications between specific meanings such as concepts, expressive meanings such as some contextual and non-implicit implications such as the opposite of propositions, have been fully investigated along with jurisprudential examples. A new divisional proposal, the place of the design of these issues, is shown in the middle of the discussion of Sharia Hajj.
کلیدواژهها [English]
قرآن کریم