نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری قرآن و علوم جامعه المصطفی العالمیه نمایندگی خراسان، مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه قرآن و علوم جامعه المصطفی العالمیه خراسان، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The different and sometimes contradictory meanings of words may be the source of disagreement and difference of opinion. The basic condition for correct inference is the accurate knowledge of the subject of scientific research with its constraints and limitations. It will be a great help to achieve the desired result if the meaning of the subject is properly clarified and the scope of its implication is determined. There is no comprehensive definition and precise interpretation of the word bribery or al-Rishwa (Arabic: اَلْرِّشْوَة) in jurisprudential texts and sources, and its limits and extents have not been properly explained. Islamic jurists and thinkers have presented various and different definitions, each of which faces several defects and problems in order to interpret and explain this word correctly. The present study, which organized to explain the nature of bribery correctly and accurately, after collecting information from the available sources in libraries and scientific centers and using a descriptive analytical method, has come to the following conclusion: It is possible to explain the correct criterion of the concept of bribery by putting together the definitions of jurists (Arabic: فُقَهاء, romanized: fuqahāʾ) and comparing the laws of Iran and Afghanistan, and deduce its exact definition, according to which, bribery is not limited to judgments and verdicts in terms of subject matter, just as it is not limited to property and actions in terms of object.
کلیدواژهها [English]