نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 مدرس گروه معارف اسلامی دانشگاه نوشیروانی بابل، بابل، ایران(نویسنده مسئول)
2 دانش آموخته سطح ۳ حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی مجتمع فقه، حقوق و قضای اسلامی حوزه علمیه قم، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the most significant events in West Asia in the past decade has been the war between the axis of resistance and the takfīrī groups, led by ISIS. The Islamic Republic of Iran, recognizing the situation and acting decisively, prevented the advancement of Zionist-American objectives. The central question of this research is: What is the fiqhī (jurisprudential) ruling on Iran’s advisory presence in these conflicts? Given the close relationship between advisory presence and jihād difāʿī (defensive jihād), this study examines the issue of jihād difāʿī, exploring key fiqhī arguments for its obligatoriness to assess and clarify the fiqhī legitimacy of the advisory presence. The hypothesis is that the advisory presence falls under jihād difāʿī, thus, the ruling of obligatoriness applies. The fiqhī legitimacy of the advisory presence is justified by arguments including the obligation of jihād difāʿī to protect the Muslim community (kiyān al-muslimīn), the religious duty to oppose the oppressor and aid the oppressed, safeguarding national security, strategic depth in the region, and protecting holy sites in Syria and Iraq. Iran’s policy regarding its advisory presence indicates that the governance of the Shiʿi state, based on dynamic fiqh, has an international dimension, addressing political issues in the Islamic world and human rights based on fiqhī indicators.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)