نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه مازندران، مازندران، ایران(نویسنده مسئول).
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه حقوق دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
4 دانشیار جامعة المصطفی العالمیة، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Intellectual property rights (IPR) are emerging issues in the contemporary era. Sometimes, due to the encroachment of others, the creator is deprived of all or some of the property and intellectual property rights. The present study, conducted using a library method and in an analytical-descriptive manner, indicates that in the jurisprudential texts (Fiqh) and the Civil Code, the institution of “usurpation” (Arabic: اَلْغَصْب, Romanized: al-ghaṣb) is defined as aggressive dominance over the property and rights of others. The term “right” in this definition is conceptually synonymous with “property,” which refers to tangible matters. However, intellectual creations are intangible. In such a case, applying and adapting dominance (the element of ghaṣb) to intellectual creations seems difficult. It seems that to adapt the elements of ghaṣb, a reinterpretation of the concept of property is needed, followed by an exploration of what is capable of being owned and what is not capable of being owned of intellectual creations. A survey of jurisprudential books shows that the concept of property is not limited to tangible matters, because propertyhas a customary concept, and custom does not restrict it to material matters, and Islamic law or al-Sharʿ has delegated its definition to custom. Therefore, anything that has financial value from the viewpoint of custom also has financial value from the viewpoint of Islamic law. The notion that the word “property ,” in the words of some jurists, and “right,” in the words of others, is restricted to tangible matters is not correct.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)