نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی و مدرس درس خارج حوزه
2 طلبه سطح چهار و دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. مشهد
3 طلبه سطح چهار و دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآنی و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Tradition after the Holy Quran, the second boiling spring of rules and knowledge, has experienced many events during its life. The existence of causes such as situation, distortion and taqiyyah, etc. in the occurrence of differences between the news, has made it necessary to critique and study the narrations, which Muslims have paid attention to from the very beginning. A look at the fundamental books of the ulema from the past to the present shows the emptiness of dealing with many effective issues in the way of interacting with the narrations, despite following the generalities of the conflict; Including the "conflict between the weak news document of the well-known practice and the correct news of the document" which is dealt with in this article in a descriptive-analytical method.
conditions of authenticity and prioritize it over the weakness of the document practiced by the scholars. Others, taking into account the application of the arguments of the authority of the single news and not daring to oppose the famous, took the path of practical caution and stopping in the position of opinion. From the point of view of a symmetrical system in the validation of narrations, it seems more correct to present a weak hadith of a well-known document on the authentic news of the document in resolving the mentioned conflict.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)