نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
1 استادیار جامعة المصطفی العالمیه
2 مدرس حوزه و دانشگاه
عنوان مقاله [English]
In the history of Islam, with the deviation of the Caliphate from the family of revelation, the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH) were forced to follow the policy of Taqiyya in order to preserve Islam and revive the pure Shiite thought. Accordingly, just as they tried to observe the direction of taqiyyah politically and theologically, this issue was also important in issuing fatwas. Although taqiyyah is one of the special conditions which is different according to the requirements of time and place, caliphs, companions, sects and religious sects, and in general, the Imams (pbuh) gave fatwas based on the real rule and without taqiyyah, but there are several cases of narrations in jurisprudential books. Which has been carried to Taqiyyah according to the rules of jurisprudence and principles. And the narrations that indicate jurisprudential taqiyya are called jurisprudential taqiyya narrations. Considering the multiplicity of jurisprudential taqiyya narrations and the existence of conflict between these narrations, the author seeks to answer the question of what is the effect and position of agreeing with the popular religion in identifying the jurisprudential taqiyya narrations so that by recognizing them the jurist can resolve the conflict between these Do narrations deduce the real verdict from narration sources?